G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS. THE PRIVATE MORTGAGE SHYSTERS OF CANADA. MY BEAUTIFUL RIVER FRONT PROPERTY WAS STOLEN by the criminals G. Eric Aleksejev and Thomas Richard Markham. THE PRIVATE MORTGAGE SCOUNDRELS OF CANADA!
OUR FAMILIES BEAUTIFUL HOPE B.C. PROPERTY.
8 ACRES ON THE FRASER RIVER
$1,000,000.00 VALUE IN TODAY'S MARKET
Stolen by the SHYSTERS G. Eric Aleksejev and Thomas Richard Markham
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
OF G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF
THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
Thomas Richard Markham is a Criminal
G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
are SHYSTERS
Shysters plural of shy·ster.
A person, esp. a lawyer, who uses unscrupulous, fraudulent, or deceptive methods in business. Probably alteration of German Scheisser, son of a bitch, bastard, from scheissen, to defecate, from Middle High German sch zen, from Old High German
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
OF G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
These two scoundrels fabricate legal documents and illegal mortgages to cheat you and steal your property. They use the Supreme Court of British Columbia to screw you out of your entire wealth and land holdings. Tom Markham has been cheating his mortgage customers for over 50 years and charging 18% interest on ridiculous Markham and Martrade mortgages.
Eric Aleksejev the lawyer helps and protects Tom Markhams illegal mortgage activity and is a criminal accomplice in stealing your home and land. You are now broke because of these scoundrels. You made payments to them on all your mortgages for years and now you are without your home and property.
The two scoundrels have taken almost $200,000.00 in mortgage interest payments at 18% and 10% from 1994 to 2005.
G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
HAVE STOLEN $76,000.00 FROM YOUR FIRE INSURANCE LOSS POLICY.
YOU HAVE NEVER RECEIVED A PROPER ACCOUNTING OF YOUR $76,000.00
TOWARDS YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS.
BOTH THESE MEN ARE CROOKS!
TOM MARKHAM IS WORTH $30,000,000.00 and HAS MADE A FORTUNE STEALING PROPERTY IN THE PRIVATE MORTGAGE BUSINESS.
TOM MARKHAM, LIVES AT 2842 WEST KING EDWARD AVENUE VANCOUVER
BRITISH COLUMBIA
TEL. NO. 604-731-4476
CALL HIM FOR A MORTGAGE!
SHAME ON YOU TOM, YOU THIEVING COWARD AND CRIMINAL.
HIDING BEHIND YOUR CRIMINAL LAWYER, BABY SON, JOYCE AND JOSE.
YOU ARE ALMOST 100 YEARS OLD AND HAVE SEX WITH YOUR WIFE AND HER FRIEND, WHO ARE ONLY IN THEIR 30'S. YOU ARE A SEX MANIAC AND A CRIMINAL TOM MARKHAM.
TO BAD FOR YOUR SON T. J.
T.J. AND JOYCE WILL PAY FOR YOUR THIEVING CRIMES!
I REMEMBER WHEN YOU ASKED ME TO HELP YOU, BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET IT UP ANYMORE.
YOU ASKED "JON, HOW CAN I ENJOY MY GIRLFRIENDS?"
I BOUGHT YOU ROYAL JELLY AND GINKO BILOBA.
YOU HAD BABY T. J. THANKS TO ME.
BABY BOY T. J. WILL BE PAYING ME MY $150,000.00 PLUS PER DIEM INTEREST FROM JANUARY OF 2006.
YOU OWE ME A TOTAL OF ALMOST $200,000.00
BABY BOY T. J. WILL INHERIT YOUR $30,000,000.00 AND HE WILL PAY UP!
YOU ALSO OWE ME FOR 2 MORTGAGE COMMISSIONS YOU MADE TO THE OTHER CRIMINAL, CHARLES MODERSBACH.
YOU ARE A COMMON THIEF
TOM RICHARD MARKHAM
THE COURTS ARE GOING TO PUT YOU IN JAIL FOR ROBBING CUSTOMERS WITH YOUR CROOKED MORTGAGES.
100 YEAR OLD TOM MARKHAM IN JAIL FOR STEALING MONEY AND PROPERTY FROM HIS MORTGAGE CUSTOMERS!
MY LAWYER TOLD ME IT'S ILLEGAL FOR YOU TO ENRICH YOURSELF WITH MY EQUITY.
PAY UP TOM MARKHAM AND GO TO YOUR GRAVE WITH A CLEAR CONSCIOUS.
GEORGE ERIC ALEKSEJEV
CROOKED LAWYER AND THIEF.
HE SWINDLES EVERYONE FOR TOM MARKHAM
READ THE FINE PRINT IN YOUR MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS, BEFORE ALEKSEJEV STEALS YOUR FAMILY PROPERTY!
GEORGE ERIC ALEKSEJEV LIES AND STEALS YOUR PROPERTY THROUGH THE COURTS, BECAUSE HE KNOWS HOW TO SWINDLE YOU, LIE, CHEAT AND TELL YOU FALSEHOODS IN COURT.
JUST LIKE JUDAS IN THE BIBLE, ALEKSEJEV BETRAYS EVERYONE FOR MONEY!
IF YOU WANT A ROTTEN CRIMINAL FOR A LAWYER, USE
ERIC ALEKSEJEV
Called to the bar:
1982 (Practicing law for 31 years)
Law Firm:
Pihl and Company
Phone:
(604) 437-8837
Fax:
(604) 437-3529
HERE TOM
READ WHAT
MY LAWYER SAID!
http://michaelmenkes.com/
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -0700
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Chilliwack file review
I stopped at the court registry and reviewed the Chilliwack file.
Interestingly, the foreclosure petition was only to foreclose on Strawberry Island on the inter alia mortgage.
The attachment is an affidavit Markham swore October 27, 2000.
According to this he did not obtain assigments of your 1st and second mortgage, he paid them out on September 30, 1999. He received $76065.00 from your insurer. I saw no evidence of assignment. They were cabable of being discharged when Markam bought them out.
the total owing as of October 31, 2000 according to Markham was $257936.57 for each and every liability.
Per diems on the three debts between October 31 and Dec 8, 2000 were
Strawberry $1243.74
Ist Mort $ 846.64
2nd Mort $ 856.14
Total owing + interest as of December 8 2000 $260883.09. The order declares a debt of $261,699.69 excluding interest and costs.
He also negotiated a higher rate of interest than you had under 1st and 2nd mortgages (7.7% and 8.25%), mortgages which were not the subject of any foreclosure.
It is clear from this affidavit that he subsequently double-counted the SI and that the intention was to consolidate all debts as one.
I think the predatory intention and actions are clear.
It is clear this is unjust enrichment of the remaining equity beyond the $260,883.09 less payments plus interest.
As discussed before, Markham's lawyer admitted on the record that the Consent Order as merely a security device against the consolidated debt.
Subject to any further comments from you, we appear ready to file and serve Mr. Markam. Do you have desciption and an address and telehone number for him?
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:07:26 -0700
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Re: Michael Menkes Review of Chilliwack File ,Here is the Markham Lawsuit in the Attachment
I apologise for the delay: I have been away from the office ill.
Dear Mr. Ross and his mother:
Mr. Ross has retained me to commence litigation against Thomas Markham relating to money owed from the proceeds of sale of property Mr. Ross owned in Hope from 1990 to 2006.
Mr. Ross owed a number of mortgages to a number of creditors and Mr. Markham, one of the creditors, bought out the other creditors. Mr. Markham himself had provided Mr. Ross financing against two properties, the Hope Property and Strawberry Island.
In 2000, Mr. Ross reached a sort of settlement with Mr. Markham which involved a court order. That court order put Mr. Ross on a payment schedule for a few years, and provided for foreclosure by Mr. Markham on both properties if he defaulted. They consolidated all debts in this court order in the amount of $261,699.69.
The Order failed to have anything in it permitting Mr. Ross to redeem the properties, although Mr. Markham's lawyer has admitted in court the intention of the Order was no more than security against the debts.
Mr. Ross made payments for several years, and inevitably found a buyer for the Hope property, but the Order remained in effect and Mr. Markham exercised his right to foreclose on the properties. He did so to take over the sale of the Hope Property for himself. It sold for $400,000.00.
It appears that Mr. Markham counted the inter alia mortgage on the Hope and Strawberry properties as two debts rather than one in calculating that he owed Mr. Ross nothing from the sale.
We allege that Mr. Markham's order merely made him a trustee, and that the foreclosure provisions are unenforceable. The law does not support penalty clauses in contracts which are out of proportion to any damages. Mr. Markham was entitled to interest on his money, but there appears to be approximately $140,000 CDN he owed to Mr. Ross and kept for himself.
This is the substance of the lawsuit against Mr. Markham. We have served it, and Mr. Markham has filed a defense. We must now do document lists and examinations for discovery, and I hope from there we can resolve this through a summary trial.
I anticipate $5000-$7000 may be required to fund this litigation, and Mr. Ross will have to travel to Canada at least once to participate in an examination for discovery.
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Where do we stand on the Tom Richard Markham File? I have told the targeted individuals,you will help us if we pay you for your time.
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:09:54 +0100
The MRI images are fascinating. have you had one done? If a device can be located I presume it can be removed.
I ran into the Rose case looking at your cases. I am attaching it as well. Rose decision
Mr. Rose's claim that you attached, and the one referenced in the decision, are so long and full of unnecessary detail that the point is lost as a needle in a haystack. The whys and wherefores of the technology need not be pleaded, only the actions of the defendants and the damage. the one paragraph I suggested yesterday.
Mr. Rose's case and pleadings are a long, elaborate, rant which appear to duck in and out of the point. One of his legal problems was that, having failed once he tried again to recast his case, which he is not entitled to do.
I haven't seen your pleadings to know whether you are in the same category to try again, but it appears that you failed to even disclose a cause of action. It is hard to say that you are not entitled to re-litigate if you never actually raised a claim.
But Mr. Rose is not a model to follow. I am not sure he is competent in a legal sense.
You misunderstood the limitation issue in the Williams decision. Any tort (intentional, like assault, or negligent, like a car accident) which causes injury to person or property has a two year limitation in BC. Justice Williams read your pleadings to allege that it was ongoing.
I would suggest that any party who had any measure in success in court thus far had evidence. Carmen has a MRI which points to evidence. If a restraining order was issued elsewhere is was on evidence. The surgical removal of a device would certainly be evidence, but we would still have to trace its source.
If there is a community of victims they may wish to compile their evidence, which may form a strong circumstantial case. Evidence is not what someone posts on the internet, which I think may have been Rose's problem. He plead a huge array of facts or which he could not imaginably have personal knowledge. An eye witness (say, a technician or surgical assistant) is evidence. A device is evidence.
If the evidence, compiled, is compelling, the best legal course of action is a class action suit so that all plaintiffs can present a joint case.
I am still waiting for the file in Chilliwack to reach New Westminster so I can review it to make sure my pleadings are correct against Markham.
I need you to instruct me here: your $2000 was intended to cover the commencement of the Markham action. Your questions about your technology case are of a complex and time consuming nature, and I have already spent 2.5 hours or $650.00 billable on it.
I would not be inclined to get on the record on the other matter, but it appears I am already acting as consultant. What do you wish me to do on that subject? In any event you will have to provide fresh funds.
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
From: JR ROSS
Date: Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:27 AM
Subject: Michael Menkes - My Copy - Re: The Thomas Richard Markham Lawsuit is no longer important. Your File Number 18924-1
To: mmenkes@shaw.ca, humanrightsdiplomat@gmail.com
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
Dear Michael,
Thomas Richard Markham is the defendant in 2 other lawsuits.
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/06/11/2006BCSC1126.htm
[1] CMIC Mortgage Investment Corporation (“CMIC”) loaned Jaspal Virdi the amount of $215,000 which was secured by a mortgage on a commercial property located at 12085 – 103A Avenue, Surrey, B.C. (the “Property”) in June 2003. In February 2004, Jaspal Virdi obtained a second mortgage in the amount of $40,000 from Thomas Markham. Jaspal Virdi defaulted on both mortgages and a petition for foreclosure was initiated by CMIC in December 2004. Bajan Virdi, Jaspal Virdi’s mother, is defending the foreclosure action on the basis that Jaspal Virdi did not have a beneficial interest in the Property. Jaspal Virdi forged a transfer of the legal title of the Property from Bajan Virdi’s name to his name and registered the transfer in the Land Title Office. Bajan Virdi seeks to set aside the mortgage on the basis that CMIC knew or ought to have known that the mortgage was obtained through fraud, and that Jaspal Virdi was not the beneficial owner of the Property. CMIC does not dispute that the transfer was fraudulent, but says that it did not know of the fraud, and that CMIC was entitled to rely on the fact that Jaspal Virdi was the registered owner of the Property. Neither Jaspal Virdi nor Mr. Markham were represented or testified at the trial. Mr. Markham supports CMIC’s position.
http://bcjustice.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8612:johal-v-virdi-to-recover-he-amounts-owed-to-them-by-the-defendants-bajan-and-jasvir-virdi-the-virdis-pursuant-to-a-mortgage&catid=606:financial-2012&Itemid=1551 Markhams name is well known to the courts.
Cheers,
Jonathan
"Injustice never rules forever"
e-mail - mmenkes@shaw.ca
On 13/01/2013 10:39 PM, JR ROSS wrote:
Dear Michael,
If you are sick or busy and fed up? Please let me know ? It has been over 1 year since the Markham lawsuit was filed. Can we pursue the lawsuit or not? Take care!
Cheers,
Jon
Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Subject: Michael Menkes Re: Tom Markham Lawsuit (Markham letter in the attachment)
To: Michael Menkes ,
Michael Menkes Esq.
Barrister and Solicitor
New Westminster
B.C. Canada
Dear Michael,
I have been thinking about the Markham lawsuit. The letter in the attachment is one of the items you have in your file. The Markham letter states payments are limited to Sept. 9, 2005. After the order absolute, no part payments will be accepted. The letter shows more of his wrong doing towards me. He was trying to discourage anymore of my payments, so he could take my property. Shall I send you a retainer for the continuation of the Markham lawsuit?
Cheers,
Jonathan
"Injustice never rules forever"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IomIER6pZY
Treat the earth well.
It was not given to you by your parents,
it was loaned to you by your children.
We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors,
we borrow it from our Children.
Ancient Indian Proverb
"There will come a time when the earth is sick and the animals and plants begin to die. Then the Indians will regain their spirit and gather people of all nations, colors and beliefs to join together in the fight to save the Earth: The Rainbow Warriors."
AUTHENTIC TEXT OF CHIEF SEATTLE'S TREATY ORATION 1854
"A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.
"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.
"One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, self-doubt, and ego.
"The other is good - he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.
"This same fight is going on inside you - and inside every other person, too."
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather,
"Which wolf will win?"
The old chief simply replied,
"The one you feed."
8 ACRES ON THE FRASER RIVER
$1,000,000.00 VALUE IN TODAY'S MARKET
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
OF G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF
THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
Thomas Richard Markham is a Criminal
See him for a mortgage if you are insane,
crazy or broke!
Tom Markham’s telephone number is
604-731-4476
Markham and Matrade Mortgages are in Vancouver B.C.
2842
West King Edward Avenue Vancouver
V6L 1T9
Visit him
at his home and say a customer sent you.
Thank you, Tom Markham for stealing my home
and property!
Tom Markham Mortgages and
Martrade Mortgages,
are your last hope for weddings, divorces,
deaths and funerals.
3 million people have seen you on the Internet!
PRIVATE MORTGAGE SHYSTERS OF CANADA
Markham is worth 30 million dollars and thinks
he doesn't have to pay the money he owes me!
PRIVATE MORTGAGE SHYSTERS OF CANADA
Markham is worth 30 million dollars and thinks
he doesn't have to pay the money he owes me!
G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
are SHYSTERS
Shysters plural of shy·ster.
A person, esp. a lawyer, who uses unscrupulous, fraudulent, or deceptive methods in business. Probably alteration of German Scheisser, son of a bitch, bastard, from scheissen, to defecate, from Middle High German sch zen, from Old High German
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
OF G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
These two scoundrels fabricate legal documents and illegal mortgages to cheat you and steal your property. They use the Supreme Court of British Columbia to screw you out of your entire wealth and land holdings. Tom Markham has been cheating his mortgage customers for over 50 years and charging 18% interest on ridiculous Markham and Martrade mortgages.
Eric Aleksejev the lawyer helps and protects Tom Markhams illegal mortgage activity and is a criminal accomplice in stealing your home and land. You are now broke because of these scoundrels. You made payments to them on all your mortgages for years and now you are without your home and property.
The two scoundrels have taken almost $200,000.00 in mortgage interest payments at 18% and 10% from 1994 to 2005.
G. ERIC ALEKSEJEV
and THOMAS RICHARD MARKHAM
HAVE STOLEN $76,000.00 FROM YOUR FIRE INSURANCE LOSS POLICY.
YOU HAVE NEVER RECEIVED A PROPER ACCOUNTING OF YOUR $76,000.00
TOWARDS YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS.
BOTH THESE MEN ARE CROOKS!
TOM MARKHAM IS WORTH $30,000,000.00 and HAS MADE A FORTUNE STEALING PROPERTY IN THE PRIVATE MORTGAGE BUSINESS.
TOM MARKHAM, LIVES AT 2842 WEST KING EDWARD AVENUE VANCOUVER
BRITISH COLUMBIA
TEL. NO. 604-731-4476
CALL HIM FOR A MORTGAGE!
SHAME ON YOU TOM, YOU THIEVING COWARD AND CRIMINAL.
HIDING BEHIND YOUR CRIMINAL LAWYER, BABY SON, JOYCE AND JOSE.
YOU ARE ALMOST 100 YEARS OLD AND HAVE SEX WITH YOUR WIFE AND HER FRIEND, WHO ARE ONLY IN THEIR 30'S. YOU ARE A SEX MANIAC AND A CRIMINAL TOM MARKHAM.
TO BAD FOR YOUR SON T. J.
T.J. AND JOYCE WILL PAY FOR YOUR THIEVING CRIMES!
I REMEMBER WHEN YOU ASKED ME TO HELP YOU, BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET IT UP ANYMORE.
YOU ASKED "JON, HOW CAN I ENJOY MY GIRLFRIENDS?"
I BOUGHT YOU ROYAL JELLY AND GINKO BILOBA.
YOU HAD BABY T. J. THANKS TO ME.
BABY BOY T. J. WILL BE PAYING ME MY $150,000.00 PLUS PER DIEM INTEREST FROM JANUARY OF 2006.
YOU OWE ME A TOTAL OF ALMOST $200,000.00
BABY BOY T. J. WILL INHERIT YOUR $30,000,000.00 AND HE WILL PAY UP!
YOU ALSO OWE ME FOR 2 MORTGAGE COMMISSIONS YOU MADE TO THE OTHER CRIMINAL, CHARLES MODERSBACH.
YOU ARE A COMMON THIEF
TOM RICHARD MARKHAM
THE COURTS ARE GOING TO PUT YOU IN JAIL FOR ROBBING CUSTOMERS WITH YOUR CROOKED MORTGAGES.
100 YEAR OLD TOM MARKHAM IN JAIL FOR STEALING MONEY AND PROPERTY FROM HIS MORTGAGE CUSTOMERS!
MY LAWYER TOLD ME IT'S ILLEGAL FOR YOU TO ENRICH YOURSELF WITH MY EQUITY.
PAY UP TOM MARKHAM AND GO TO YOUR GRAVE WITH A CLEAR CONSCIOUS.
GEORGE ERIC ALEKSEJEV
CROOKED LAWYER AND THIEF.
HE SWINDLES EVERYONE FOR TOM MARKHAM
READ THE FINE PRINT IN YOUR MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS, BEFORE ALEKSEJEV STEALS YOUR FAMILY PROPERTY!
GEORGE ERIC ALEKSEJEV LIES AND STEALS YOUR PROPERTY THROUGH THE COURTS, BECAUSE HE KNOWS HOW TO SWINDLE YOU, LIE, CHEAT AND TELL YOU FALSEHOODS IN COURT.
JUST LIKE JUDAS IN THE BIBLE, ALEKSEJEV BETRAYS EVERYONE FOR MONEY!
IF YOU WANT A ROTTEN CRIMINAL FOR A LAWYER, USE
ERIC ALEKSEJEV
Email: geric@vcn.bc.ca
G. Eric Aleksejev
Called to the bar: 1982 (BC)
205-5481 Kingsway
Burnaby, British Columbia V5H 2G1
Phone: 604-437-8837
Fax: 604-437-3529
Email: geric@vcn.bc.caEric Aleksejev, Burnaby - Attorney Profile
205-5481 Kingsway Burnaby, British Columbia V5H-2G1, Canada
Eric Aleksejev
|
|
1982 (Practicing law for 31 years)
Law Firm:
Pihl and Company
Phone:
(604) 437-8837
Fax:
(604) 437-3529
HERE TOM
READ WHAT
MY LAWYER SAID!
http://michaelmenkes.com/
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:33:31 -0700
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Chilliwack file review
I stopped at the court registry and reviewed the Chilliwack file.
Interestingly, the foreclosure petition was only to foreclose on Strawberry Island on the inter alia mortgage.
The attachment is an affidavit Markham swore October 27, 2000.
According to this he did not obtain assigments of your 1st and second mortgage, he paid them out on September 30, 1999. He received $76065.00 from your insurer. I saw no evidence of assignment. They were cabable of being discharged when Markam bought them out.
the total owing as of October 31, 2000 according to Markham was $257936.57 for each and every liability.
Per diems on the three debts between October 31 and Dec 8, 2000 were
Strawberry $1243.74
Ist Mort $ 846.64
2nd Mort $ 856.14
Total owing + interest as of December 8 2000 $260883.09. The order declares a debt of $261,699.69 excluding interest and costs.
He also negotiated a higher rate of interest than you had under 1st and 2nd mortgages (7.7% and 8.25%), mortgages which were not the subject of any foreclosure.
It is clear from this affidavit that he subsequently double-counted the SI and that the intention was to consolidate all debts as one.
I think the predatory intention and actions are clear.
It is clear this is unjust enrichment of the remaining equity beyond the $260,883.09 less payments plus interest.
As discussed before, Markham's lawyer admitted on the record that the Consent Order as merely a security device against the consolidated debt.
Subject to any further comments from you, we appear ready to file and serve Mr. Markam. Do you have desciption and an address and telehone number for him?
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:07:26 -0700
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Re: Michael Menkes Review of Chilliwack File ,Here is the Markham Lawsuit in the Attachment
I apologise for the delay: I have been away from the office ill.
Dear Mr. Ross and his mother:
Mr. Ross has retained me to commence litigation against Thomas Markham relating to money owed from the proceeds of sale of property Mr. Ross owned in Hope from 1990 to 2006.
Mr. Ross owed a number of mortgages to a number of creditors and Mr. Markham, one of the creditors, bought out the other creditors. Mr. Markham himself had provided Mr. Ross financing against two properties, the Hope Property and Strawberry Island.
In 2000, Mr. Ross reached a sort of settlement with Mr. Markham which involved a court order. That court order put Mr. Ross on a payment schedule for a few years, and provided for foreclosure by Mr. Markham on both properties if he defaulted. They consolidated all debts in this court order in the amount of $261,699.69.
The Order failed to have anything in it permitting Mr. Ross to redeem the properties, although Mr. Markham's lawyer has admitted in court the intention of the Order was no more than security against the debts.
Mr. Ross made payments for several years, and inevitably found a buyer for the Hope property, but the Order remained in effect and Mr. Markham exercised his right to foreclose on the properties. He did so to take over the sale of the Hope Property for himself. It sold for $400,000.00.
It appears that Mr. Markham counted the inter alia mortgage on the Hope and Strawberry properties as two debts rather than one in calculating that he owed Mr. Ross nothing from the sale.
We allege that Mr. Markham's order merely made him a trustee, and that the foreclosure provisions are unenforceable. The law does not support penalty clauses in contracts which are out of proportion to any damages. Mr. Markham was entitled to interest on his money, but there appears to be approximately $140,000 CDN he owed to Mr. Ross and kept for himself.
This is the substance of the lawsuit against Mr. Markham. We have served it, and Mr. Markham has filed a defense. We must now do document lists and examinations for discovery, and I hope from there we can resolve this through a summary trial.
I anticipate $5000-$7000 may be required to fund this litigation, and Mr. Ross will have to travel to Canada at least once to participate in an examination for discovery.
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
From: mmenkes@shaw.ca
To: human-rights@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Where do we stand on the Tom Richard Markham File? I have told the targeted individuals,you will help us if we pay you for your time.
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:09:54 +0100
The MRI images are fascinating. have you had one done? If a device can be located I presume it can be removed.
I ran into the Rose case looking at your cases. I am attaching it as well. Rose decision
Mr. Rose's claim that you attached, and the one referenced in the decision, are so long and full of unnecessary detail that the point is lost as a needle in a haystack. The whys and wherefores of the technology need not be pleaded, only the actions of the defendants and the damage. the one paragraph I suggested yesterday.
Mr. Rose's case and pleadings are a long, elaborate, rant which appear to duck in and out of the point. One of his legal problems was that, having failed once he tried again to recast his case, which he is not entitled to do.
I haven't seen your pleadings to know whether you are in the same category to try again, but it appears that you failed to even disclose a cause of action. It is hard to say that you are not entitled to re-litigate if you never actually raised a claim.
But Mr. Rose is not a model to follow. I am not sure he is competent in a legal sense.
You misunderstood the limitation issue in the Williams decision. Any tort (intentional, like assault, or negligent, like a car accident) which causes injury to person or property has a two year limitation in BC. Justice Williams read your pleadings to allege that it was ongoing.
I would suggest that any party who had any measure in success in court thus far had evidence. Carmen has a MRI which points to evidence. If a restraining order was issued elsewhere is was on evidence. The surgical removal of a device would certainly be evidence, but we would still have to trace its source.
If there is a community of victims they may wish to compile their evidence, which may form a strong circumstantial case. Evidence is not what someone posts on the internet, which I think may have been Rose's problem. He plead a huge array of facts or which he could not imaginably have personal knowledge. An eye witness (say, a technician or surgical assistant) is evidence. A device is evidence.
If the evidence, compiled, is compelling, the best legal course of action is a class action suit so that all plaintiffs can present a joint case.
I am still waiting for the file in Chilliwack to reach New Westminster so I can review it to make sure my pleadings are correct against Markham.
I need you to instruct me here: your $2000 was intended to cover the commencement of the Markham action. Your questions about your technology case are of a complex and time consuming nature, and I have already spent 2.5 hours or $650.00 billable on it.
I would not be inclined to get on the record on the other matter, but it appears I am already acting as consultant. What do you wish me to do on that subject? In any event you will have to provide fresh funds.
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
telephone 604-521-8885 ext 309
fax 604-521-3611
From: JR ROSS
Date: Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:27 AM
Subject: Michael Menkes - My Copy - Re: The Thomas Richard Markham Lawsuit is no longer important. Your File Number 18924-1
To: mmenkes@shaw.ca, humanrightsdiplomat@gmail.com
Michael S. Menkes
Barrister and Solicitor
1st Floor 631 Carnarvon Street
New Westminster B.C. V3M 1E3
Dear Michael,
Thomas Richard Markham is the defendant in 2 other lawsuits.
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/06/11/2006BCSC1126.htm
[1] CMIC Mortgage Investment Corporation (“CMIC”) loaned Jaspal Virdi the amount of $215,000 which was secured by a mortgage on a commercial property located at 12085 – 103A Avenue, Surrey, B.C. (the “Property”) in June 2003. In February 2004, Jaspal Virdi obtained a second mortgage in the amount of $40,000 from Thomas Markham. Jaspal Virdi defaulted on both mortgages and a petition for foreclosure was initiated by CMIC in December 2004. Bajan Virdi, Jaspal Virdi’s mother, is defending the foreclosure action on the basis that Jaspal Virdi did not have a beneficial interest in the Property. Jaspal Virdi forged a transfer of the legal title of the Property from Bajan Virdi’s name to his name and registered the transfer in the Land Title Office. Bajan Virdi seeks to set aside the mortgage on the basis that CMIC knew or ought to have known that the mortgage was obtained through fraud, and that Jaspal Virdi was not the beneficial owner of the Property. CMIC does not dispute that the transfer was fraudulent, but says that it did not know of the fraud, and that CMIC was entitled to rely on the fact that Jaspal Virdi was the registered owner of the Property. Neither Jaspal Virdi nor Mr. Markham were represented or testified at the trial. Mr. Markham supports CMIC’s position.
http://bcjustice.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8612:johal-v-virdi-to-recover-he-amounts-owed-to-them-by-the-defendants-bajan-and-jasvir-virdi-the-virdis-pursuant-to-a-mortgage&catid=606:financial-2012&Itemid=1551 Markhams name is well known to the courts.
Cheers,
Jonathan
"Injustice never rules forever"
e-mail - mmenkes@shaw.ca
On 13/01/2013 10:39 PM, JR ROSS wrote:
Dear Michael,
If you are sick or busy and fed up? Please let me know ? It has been over 1 year since the Markham lawsuit was filed. Can we pursue the lawsuit or not? Take care!
Cheers,
Jon
Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Subject: Michael Menkes Re: Tom Markham Lawsuit (Markham letter in the attachment)
To: Michael Menkes ,
Michael Menkes Esq.
Barrister and Solicitor
New Westminster
B.C. Canada
Dear Michael,
I have been thinking about the Markham lawsuit. The letter in the attachment is one of the items you have in your file. The Markham letter states payments are limited to Sept. 9, 2005. After the order absolute, no part payments will be accepted. The letter shows more of his wrong doing towards me. He was trying to discourage anymore of my payments, so he could take my property. Shall I send you a retainer for the continuation of the Markham lawsuit?
Cheers,
Jonathan
"Injustice never rules forever"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IomIER6pZY
"CHIEF SEATTLE'S 1854 ORATION
Treat the earth well.
It was not given to you by your parents,
it was loaned to you by your children.
We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors,
we borrow it from our Children.
Ancient Indian Proverb
"There will come a time when the earth is sick and the animals and plants begin to die. Then the Indians will regain their spirit and gather people of all nations, colors and beliefs to join together in the fight to save the Earth: The Rainbow Warriors."
AUTHENTIC TEXT OF CHIEF SEATTLE'S TREATY ORATION 1854
"Yonder sky that has wept tears of compassion upon my people for
centuries untold, and which to us appears changeless and eternal, may
change. Today is fair. Tomorrow it may be overcast with clouds. My
words are like the stars that never change. Whatever Seattle says, the
great chief at Washington can rely upon with as much certainty as he can
upon the return
of the sun or the seasons. The white chief says that Big Chief at
Washington sends us greetings of friendship and goodwill. This is kind
of him for we know he has little need of our friendship in return. His
people are many. They are like the grass that covers vast prairies. My
people are few. They resemble the scattering trees of a storm-swept
plain. The great, and I presume -- good, White Chief sends us word that
he wishes to buy our land but is willing to allow us enough to live
comfortably. This indeed appears just, even generous, for the Red Man
no longer has rights that he need respect, and the offer may be wise,
also, as we are no longer in need of an extensive country.
There was a time when our people covered the land as the waves of a
wind-ruffled sea cover its shell-paved floor, but that time long since
passed away with the greatness of tribes that are now but a mournful
memory. I will not dwell on, nor mourn over, our untimely decay, nor
reproach my paleface brothers with hastening it, as we too may have been
somewhat to blame.
Youth is impulsive. When our young men grow angry at some real or
imaginary wrong, and disfigure their faces with black paint, it denotes
that their hearts are black, and that they are often cruel and
relentless, and our old men and old women are unable to restrain them.
Thus it has ever been. Thus it was when the white man began to push our
forefathers ever westward. But let us hope that the hostilities
between us may never return. We would have everything to lose and
nothing to gain. Revenge by young men is considered gain, even at the
cost of their own lives, but old men who stay at home in times of war,
and mothers who have sons to lose, know better.
Our
good father in Washington--for I presume he is now our father as well
as yours, since King George has moved his boundaries further north--our
great and good father, I say, sends us word that if we do as he desires
he will protect us. His brave warriors will be to us a bristling wall
of strength, and his wonderful ships of war will fill our harbors, so
that our ancient enemies far to the northward -- the Haidas and
Tsimshians -- will cease to frighten our women, children, and old men.
Then in reality he will be our father and we his children. But can that
ever be? Your God is not our God! Your God loves your people and
hates mine! He folds his strong protecting arms lovingly about the
paleface and leads him by the hand as a father leads an infant son.
But, He has forsaken His Red children, if they really are His. Our God,
the Great Spirit, seems also to have forsaken us.
Your God makes your people wax stronger every day. Soon they will fill
all the land. Our people are ebbing away like a rapidly receding tide
that will never return. The white man's God cannot love our people or
He would protect them. They seem to be orphans who can look nowhere for
help. How then can we be brothers? How can your God become our God
and renew our prosperity and awaken in us dreams of returning greatness?
If we have a common Heavenly Father He must be partial, for He came to
His paleface children.
We never saw Him. He gave you laws but had no word for His red children
whose teeming multitudes once filled this vast continent as stars fill
the firmament. No; we are two distinct races with separate origins and
separate destinies. There is little in common between us.
To us the ashes of our ancestors are sacred and their resting place is
hallowed ground. You wander far from the graves of your ancestors and
seemingly without regret. Your religion was written upon tablets of
stone by the iron finger of your God so that you could not forget. The
Red Man could never comprehend or remember it. Our religion is the
traditions of our ancestors -- the dreams of our old men, given them in
solemn hours of the night by the Great Spirit; and the visions of our
sachems, and is written in the hearts of our people.
Your dead cease to love you and the land of their nativity as soon as
they pass the portals of the tomb and wander away beyond the stars.
They are soon forgotten and never return. Our dead never forget this
beautiful world that gave them being. They still love its verdant
valleys, its murmuring rivers, its magnificent mountains, sequestered
vales and verdant lined lakes and bays, and ever yearn in tender fond
affection over the lonely hearted living, and often return from the
happy hunting ground to visit, guide, console, and comfort them.
Day and night cannot dwell together. The Red Man has ever fled the
approach of the White Man, as the morning mist flees before the morning
sun. However, your proposition seems fair and I think that my people
will accept it and will retire to the reservation you offer them. Then
we will dwell apart in peace, for the words of the Great White Chief
seem to be the words of nature speaking to my people out of dense
darkness.
It matters little where we pass the remnant of our days. They will not
be many. The Indian's night promises to be dark. Not a single star of
hope hovers above his horizon. Sad-voiced winds moan in the distance.
Grim fate seems to be on the Red Man's trail, and wherever he will hear
the approaching footsteps of his fell destroyer and prepare stolidly to
meet his doom, as does the wounded doe that hears the approaching
footsteps of the hunter.
A few more moons, a few more winters, and not one of the descendants of
the mighty hosts that once moved over this broad land or lived in happy
homes, protected by the Great Spirit, will remain to mourn over the
graves of a people once more powerful and hopeful than yours. But why
should I mourn at the untimely fate of my people? Tribe follows tribe,
and nation follows nation, like the waves of the sea. It is the order
of nature, and regret is useless. Your time of decay may be distant,
but it will surely come, for even the White Man whose God walked and
talked with him as friend to friend, cannot be exempt from the common
destiny. We may be brothers after all. We will see.
We will ponder your proposition and when we decide we will let you know.
But should we accept it, I here and now make this condition that we
will not be denied the privilege without molestation of visiting at any
time the tombs of our ancestors, friends, and children. Every part of
this soil is sacred in the estimation of my people. Every hillside,
every valley, every plain and grove, has been hallowed by some sad or
happy event in days long vanished. Even the rocks, which seem to be
dumb and dead as the swelter in the sun along the silent shore, thrill
with memories of stirring events connected with the lives of my people,
and the very dust upon which you now stand responds more lovingly to
their footsteps than yours, because it is rich with the blood of our
ancestors, and our bare feet are conscious of the sympathetic touch.
Our departed braves, fond mothers, glad, happy hearted maidens, and even
the little children who lived here and rejoiced here for a brief
season, will love these somber solitudes and at eventide they greet
shadowy returning spirits. And when the last Red Man shall have
perished, and the memory of my tribe shall have become a myth among the
White Men, these shores will swarm with the invisible dead of my tribe,
and when your children's children think themselves alone in the field,
the store, the shop, upon the highway, or in the silence of the pathless
woods, they will not be alone. In all the earth there is no place
dedicated to solitude.
At night when the streets of your cities and villages are silent and you
think them deserted, they will throng with the returning hosts that
once filled them and still love this beautiful land.
The White Man will never be alone.
Let him be just and deal kindly with my people, for the dead are not
powerless. Dead, did I say? There is no death, only a change of
worlds."
Two Wolves - A Cherokee Parable
An old Cherokee chief was teaching his grandson about life..."A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.
"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.
"One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, self-doubt, and ego.
"The other is good - he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.
"This same fight is going on inside you - and inside every other person, too."
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather,
"Which wolf will win?"
The old chief simply replied,
"The one you feed."
THE SCOUNDREL DAVID WILLIAMS IS TRYING TO SELL MY HOPE RIVER PROPERTY FOR $995,000, https://www.forsalebyowner.ca/listing/land-for-sale-hope-BC/207821. THE ROTTEN SOD PAID ONLY $400,000 FOR MY PROPERTY IN AN ILLEGAL SALE FROM MY CROOKED LENDOR TOM MARKHAM. TOM MARKHAM WAS MURDERED BY HIS YOUNG WIFE SHORTLY AFTER THE SALE. https://www.forsalebyowner.ca/listing/land-for-sale-hope-BC/207821
ReplyDeleteTHE THIEVING SCOUNDREL DAVID WILLIAMS IS USING ALL MY SUBDIVISION LAYOUTS AND PRELIMINARY LAYOUT APPROVALS. THE PROPERTY HAS A VALUE OF PERHAPS $650,000.00 BUT CERTAINLY NOT MORE. WHEN YOU ARE DEALING WITH MONEY HUNGRY THIEVES SOMETIMES YOU MISS OUT BUT SO WILL THEY IN THE END!
fuck off
ReplyDelete